Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Book Reviews
Classics In Indian Medicine
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Case Reports
Clinical Research Methods
Clinico-pathological Conference
Eminent Indians in Medicine
Everyday Practice
Film Review
History of Medicine
Images In Medicine
Indian Medical Institutions
Letter from Bristol
Letter from Chennai
Letter From Ganiyari
Letter from Glasgow
Letter from London
Letter From Mumbai
Letter From Nepal
Medical Education
Medical Ethics
Medicine and Society
News From Here And There
Original Article
Original Articles
Review Article
Selected Summaries
Selected Summary
Short Report
Short Reports
Speaking for Myself
Speaking for Ourselve
Speaking for Ourselves
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

doi: 10.4103/0970-258X.275362
PMID: 31939418

Competency-based curriculum: Mirage or reality

Puja Dulloo
 Department of Physiology, Dr MKSMC and RC, Chandkheda, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Corresponding Author:
Puja Dulloo
Department of Physiology, Dr MKSMC and RC, Chandkheda, Ahmedabad, Gujarat
How to cite this article:
Dulloo P. Competency-based curriculum: Mirage or reality. Natl Med J India 2019;32:125-126
Copyright: (C)2019 The National Medical Journal of India

Beginning with the new batch of medical students, the Medical Council of India (MCI) has introduced a month-long foundation course followed by an Attitude, Ethics and Communication (AETCOM) module[1] along with the competency-based core subjects namely, anatomy, physiology, biochemistry and community medicine.[2] To know whether the course is working with the same objectives and goals as envisaged by the MCI, in all institutes, is difficult, as getting the curriculum operational in about 500 medical colleges in one go is not an easy task. No country till date seems to have organized such a major curricular change. Faculty training workshops have been organized since 2015, to prepare institutes for the final launch of ′VISION 2015′ of the MCI from the batch of 2019-2020.[3]

I do support this initiative, as a faculty, because I felt a need for a foundation programme, so that students get acclimatized to the institutional setting and comprehend the extent of the medical course. The change is big and so would be the challenges. I would like to highlight some of the dimensions of this new competency-based curriculum (CBC).

Each subject and every topic in the programme has well-stated competencies. Departments have to prepare objectives (general and specific) with the liberty to explain the competency/ies in one or two sessions, using teaching-learning approaches of their choice.[4] Topic delivery has to be in an aligned and integrated manner. Although the previous curriculum did focus on the integrated approach, but the integration was not mandatory.[5] Medical education cannot be confined merely to books and lectures. The aligned and integrated approach would allow students to assimilate the basic content at their level for clinical practice and probably yield better outcomes for the medical education system.

The curriculum proposes at least 60% of sessions to be small- group teaching (SGT), tutorials or practical demonstration,4 allowing interaction between students and faculties. However, it is peculiar that for a batch of 150 students, the number of minimum faculty recommended by the MCI is seven.[6] Mathematically, with seven real faculty (not considering ghost faculties), the SGT size would be 21 students, implying the presence of every faculty for each session. Is this practically possible? Furthermore, some of the institutes have allied courses going on in parallel with the medical programme, for which the same faculty is engaged and the council has no specific rules to tackle this issue.

Sufficient time has been allocated to self-directed learning and early clinical exposure (ECE).[4] This may look like an easy task, with less burden. However, it is not true. Its pre-preparation is a great task, starting from objectives and assessing students with questions, discussions or reflective writing, to identify the attainment of outcome, followed by summarization. A major question that has to be answered is, how will ECE work? Are all the faculties open to this new scheme or are they just going with the flow?

A well-structured, 36-hours, AETCOM module,[1] focusing on the affective domain, is appealing. My concern, is whether we are adequately trained to conduct it? Gandhiji had said that he liked to undertake a task only after he had acquired confidence in carrying it out. In the same way, the faculty needs to be confident that it can carry out this onerous task. We would have to work hard to acquire this confidence and also accept and carry out this change in curriculum. The assessment technique, for the integrated topics, is challenging.

To ease this, a module has been published by the MCI on its website, which includes the format of the structured long- and short-answer questions and multiple-choice questions (MCQs).[7]

Another question bothering me is the progress of undergraduates towards the postgraduate (PG) programme. The present PG selection test, i.e. the National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test for PGs (NEET- PG), is still MCQ-oriented,5 based on ′knows′ and ′know-how′ aspect of Bloom′s taxonomy[8] and does not match the undergraduate assessment pattern. Thus, it compels undergraduate students and interns to join coaching institutes, spending extra money for their education. If the medical programme is a continuous process, taught within the medical institutes, then why is there a need for coaching institutes or portals? Aren′t our medical institutes preparing graduates adequately, or are the requirements and prerequisites for the selection process somewhat different from what we are preparing them for? Many more questions are yet unanswered, but I am sure we will be able to find an answer for each as we move ahead.

Feedback from faculty members, administrative authorities and

students (private and government) on the new curriculum, while they are going through it and even after its completion, will help the MCI evaluate the programme in a better way and make necessary corrections. The opinion of stakeholders, countrywide, will provide a clear idea of the programme implementation and may provide suggestions to make it better and effective.

I believe that, in due course, evidence would be gathered, for and against, the competency-based curriculum within India and would allow authorities to modify the same for better outcomes. The choice lies in our hands; whether we mine and cut diamonds, or simply dig out more stones.

Medical Council of India. Attitude, Ethics and Communication, Competencies for the Indian Medical Graduate. Medical Council of India; 2018:1– 94. Available at (accessed on 7 Mar 2019).
[Google Scholar]
Medical Council of India Regulations for Foundation Course for the Undergraduate Medical Education Program; 2019:1– 46. Available at uploads/2019/08/foundation-new_compressed.pdf (accessed on 7 Mar 2019).
[Google Scholar]
Medical Council of India. Vision. Medical Council of India; 2015:1– 60. Available at (accessed on 7 Mar 2019).
[Google Scholar]
Medical Council of India. Competency Based Undergraduate Curriculum for The Indian Medical Graduate. Medical Council of India; 2018:1– 263. Available at (accessed on 7 Mar 2019).
[Google Scholar]
Singh T, Modi JN, Kumar V, Dhaliwal U, Gupta P, Sood R, et al. Admission to undergraduate and postgraduate medical courses: Looking beyond single entrance examinations. Indian Pediatr 2017;54:231– 8.
[Google Scholar]
Medical Council of India. Minimum Standard Requirements for the Medical College for 150 Admissions Annually Regulations, 1999; January, 2018. Available at Requirements-for-150-Admissions.pdf (accessed on 7 Mar 2019).
[Google Scholar]
Medical Council of India. Competency Based Assessment Module for Undergraduate Medical Education. Medical Council of India; 2019:1– 37. Available at https:// based_02.09.2019.pdf (accessed on 7 Mar 2019).
[Google Scholar]
Bloom BS, Krathwohl DR. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. In: Handbook 1; Cognitive Domain. New York:Longman; 1956.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views

PDF downloads
Show Sections