Short Reports 73
Guillain–Barré syndrome: Association with Campylobacter jejuni and Mycoplasma
pneumoniae infections
in India
S. P. GORTHI, LATA KAPOOR, RAMA CHAUDHRY, NIDHI SHARMA,
GUILLERMO I. PEREZ-PEREZ,
PINAKI PANIGRAHI, MADHURI BEHARI
ABSTRACT
Background. Guillain–Barré syndrome is the
most common cause of acute neuromuscular paralysis and
is considered a post-infectious disease.
Methods. Twenty patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome
admitted to the Neurosciences Centre at the All India
Institute of Medical Sciences from November 1997 to August
1998 were investigated for evidence of antecedent infections.
This case–control study included 2 controls for
each patient, one a household control and the other an
age- and sex-matched hospital control suffering from
a neurological illness other than Guillain–Barré syndrome.
Evidence of recent Campylobacter jejuni infection was
investigated by culture and serology, and for Mycoplasma
pneumoniae by serology.
Results. There was evidence of recent C. jejuni infection
in 35% of the patients compared with 25% of household
controls and none of the hospital controls. M. pneumoniae
infection was seen in 50% of patients compared with 25%
of household controls and 15% of hospital controls. About
one-third of the patients (30%) had evidence of both
infections. The association of both infections in patients
was found to be statistically significant as compared
to hospital controls.
Conclusion. C. jejuni and M. pneumoniae may be important
antecedent illnesses in patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome
in India.
Natl Med J India 2006;19:137–9
INTRODUCTION
Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) is the most
common cause
of acute neuromuscular paralysis.1 GBS is a disorder
of the peripheral nervous system characterized by weakness,
usually symmetrical, of the limbs and respiratory muscles
and areflexia. The disease is self-limiting; however,
15%–20% of patients have severe residual neurological
deficits. Electrophysiological and pathological studies
have revealed several patterns of GBS, namely acute inflammatory
demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP), acute motor axonal
neuropathy (AMAN), acute motor and axonal neuropathy
(AMSAN) and the Miller Fisher syndrome.2
GBS is considered a post-infectious disease as approximately
two-thirds of patients report some form of preceding
infectious illness, especially of the respiratory or
gastrointestinal tracts, in the previous 3 weeks.3 A
number of specific infectious agents have been reported
in patients with GBS including Campylobacter jejuni,
Mycoplasma pneumoniae, cytomegalovirus, Ebstein–Barr
virus, etc.4,5 The pathogenesis of GBS is still unknown
but an autoimmune-mediated mechanism, possibly triggered
by an infectious agent sharing epitopes with neural antigens
(molecular mimicry) has been proposed.1 Kaldor and Speed
reported C. jejuni infection as the most common antecedent
illness in patients with GBS.1
The lipopolysaccharide
coat of Campylobacter is rich in glycoconjugates which
resemble human glycoconjugates. Antibodies against various
gangliosides have been reported in a variable proportion
of patients with GBS and their decrease during clinical
improvement supports a possible pathogenetic role in
the neuropathy.
There is a paucity of data from India regarding antecedent
infections in patients with GBS. A study by Hariharan
et al.6 reported the role of precedent C. jejuni infections
in this group of patients but the role of M. pneumoniae
has not been studied. Moreover, their study was based
on a select group of patients with GBS without age- and
sex-matched controls and may therefore represent coincidental
findings. We designed a case–control study to determine
the association of GBS with precedent M. pneumoniae and
C. jejuni infection in the Indian population.
METHODS
All patients admitted with a clinical diagnosis of GBS
to the Neurosciences Centre of All India Institute of
Medical Sciences, New Delhi from November 1997 to August
1998 were included. The diagnosis of GBS was defined
clinically according to the criteria of Asbury and Cornblath.7 Briefly, the diagnosis was based on a history of progressive
weakness of more than one limb over a period of <4
weeks, thought to be due to a neuropathy, in the absence
of any identifiable genetic, metabolic or toxic cause.
Electrophysiological studies were done which showed nerve
conduction slowing with features of demyelination and/or
axonal damage.
At admission, each patient was asked about the occurrence
of acute gastroenteritis or an acute respiratory tract
infection in the preceeding month. Acute gastroenteritis
was defined as a brief illness of 1–6 days with
increased frequency of stools (>3/day) of soft consistency
with or without blood. Acute respiratory tract infection
was defined as an acute illness characterized by fever
(100–103 °F) with cough and malaise with or
without expectoration. Electrophysiological studies were
done to classify the pattern of GBS.
Age- and sex-matched (within 2 years) inpatients suffering
from a non-GBS neurological illness with no antecedent
history of gastroenteritis or respiratory tract infections
were included as controls (hospital control). None of
the hospital controls suffered from peripheral neuropathies.
Blood was also collected from a member of the patient’s
household (household control). An informed consent was
obtained from all the patients and controls after explaining
to them the study protocol.
Microbiological investigations
Two stool specimens were collected from each patient
within 48 hours of admission. Stool specimens were cultured
on a medium selective for C. jejuni, i.e. Campylobacter blood agar base with Butzler supplement (Hi-media Laboratories,
Mumbai, India). Specimens were also cultured by the filtration
technique on 5% sheep blood agar as previously described.8
The latter method was used to detect strains of Campylobacter that may have been sensitive to the antibiotics contained
in the selective media. The plates were incubated at
42 °C in a microaerophilic atmosphere for 3–5
days. The Gram-negative, oxidase-positive, catalase-positive
isolates were identified by conventional biochemical
methods.8
Serum samples were obtained from the patients at the
time of admission, and serum samples from cases and controls
were stored at –20 °C till tested. The investigator
who analysed the specimens for various immunological
studies was blinded to the origin of the specimens (whether
from a patient, hospital control or household control).
The presence of serum IgA, IgG and IgM antibodies specific
for C. jejuni was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA) at dilutions of 1:50, 1:200 and 1:400 as
described by Blaser and Duncan.9 A serum sample was considered
positive when two or more immunoglobulin classes showed
a value greater than or equal to the mean+2SD optical
density of 40 uninfected children (OD ratio value) in
ELISA. M. pneumoniae antibodies were detected by the
gelatin particle agglutination test. For this, Serodia
Myco II test kit (Fuji Rebio Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was
used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
A titre of 1:80 was taken as indicative of recent infection.
10
Statistical analysis
The association of seropositivity in the patient and
control groups was determined using the chi-square test.
When one of the values was <5, the Fischer exact test
was used.
RESULTS
Twenty patients with a clinical diagnosis of GBS were
included in the study. Of these, 18 were men. The mean
age of the patients was 31 (range 13–72) years.
Eighty-five per cent of the patients were in the age
group of 13–40 years. Most of the cases presented
during the summer and rainy season. Three patients gave
a history of diarrhoea, 8 of acute respiratory tract
infection and 3 of fever in the preceding 3 weeks (Table
I).
Table I. Frequency of preceding infections
in patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome |
Type of infection |
n |
C. jejuni serology |
M. pneumoniae |
Diarrhoea |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Respiratory tract |
8 |
0 |
5 |
Fever |
3 |
0 |
1 |
None |
6 |
5 |
4 |
Microbiological investigations
Stool cultures of all cases and controls were negative
for C. jejuni. Of the 7 patients with serology positive
for recent C. jejuni infection, 2 gave a history of
gastroenteritis. One patient with a history of gastroenteritis
was negative
for C. jejuni serology. Of the 11 patients with serology
positive for M. pneumoniae, 5 gave a history of acute
respiratory tract illness. One patient with a history
of fever was positive for M. pneumoniae serology and
of the 6 cases with no preceding infection 3 were positive
for M. pneumoniae and C. jejuni, 2 for C. jejuni and
1 for M. pneumoniae serology. The association between
patients and household controls for both infections
was not significant (Tables I and II).
Table II. Comparison of M. pneumoniae
and C. jejuni positive serology in patients and controls |
Organism |
Patients
n (%) |
Hospital controls
n (%) |
p value |
OR
(95% CI) |
Household controls
n (%)
|
p value |
OR
(95% CI) |
C. jejuni |
7 (35) |
0 |
0.008 |
Infinite |
5 (25) |
0.49 |
1.62 (0.34–7.88) |
M. pneumoniae |
11 (55) |
3 (15) |
0.008 |
6.93 (1.29–46.3) |
5 (25) |
0.49 |
3.67(0.81–17.74) |
OR odds ratio CI confidence interval |
Clinical data
There was no significant age or sex difference between
those with and without evidence of recent infection.
The mean (SD) duration of symptoms at the time of
presentation was 4 (3.2) days (range 0.5–14 days).
Three of the patients died during hospitalization. Of
these, 2
were positive for M. pneumoniae serology and 1 for
M. pneumoniae and C. jejuni serology. One patient had
a
variant of GBS with pure motor weakness and bilateral
ptosis. Autonomic disturbances in the form of rhythm
disturbances and fluctuating blood pressure were
seen in 4 patients and cranial nerve involvement in 11.
Electrophysiological studies revealed demyelinating
neuropathy in 1 patient, 6 had totally unresponsive
nerves and 13
could not be classified into any of the patterns
of GBS. There was a statistical significance between
the
patients
with recent c. jejuni infection and the hospital
controls (p=0.008) but not with the household controls
(p=0.49)
(Table II). The association of recent M. pneumoniae infection was found to be highly significant when
compared with
hospital controls (p=0.008) and nearly significant
with household controls (p=0.05) (Table II).
DISCUSSION
We used serology to detect recent M. pneumoniae and
C. jejuni infections. The diagnosis of recent M.
pneumoniae infections is usually based on serology,
as culture
is
time-consuming and not readily available.
11 Although
isolation from the faeces is the ideal method for
the diagnosis of C. jejuni infection,
1 we were unable
to
isolate C. jejuni in our patients. This could be
because the median duration of excretion of Campylobacter
in
the stool is only 16 days and because of the 1–3-week
lag time between the infection and the onset of GBS,
many patients with GBS and preceding Campylobacter infection might have had falsely negative stool cultures.
2 These
limitations make serology the mainstay of diagnosis
of antecedent C. jejuni infections in patients with
GBS.
The availability in India of over-the-counter antibiotics
could have countributed to the negative culture results.
A variety of antibody assays for detecting specific
antibodies to C. jejuni have been reported. However,
there are no
standards for testing with regard to the antigen
used or end-points for positivity. We used stringent
serological
criteria for the diagnosis of recent C. jejuni infection
(positive ELISA for at least 2 classes of antibodies)
to exclude false-positive results. A diagnosis based
on positive ELISA for a single class of antibody
may result in false-positive results. Rees et al.
have found
that an isolated IgM immune response to C. jejuni may also occur after Salmonella
enteritis.12
In our study, 35% of the patients with GBS had evidence
of recent C. jejuni infection. This is higher than
that reported by Rees et al. (26%), Winer et al.
(14%) and
in the Emilia–Romagna study group (15%).
12–14 Two retrospective studies that used an ELISA to detect
C. jejuni infection, reported comparable seropositivity
rates of 36% and 38%.1,2 These 2 studies were done at
tertiary care referral hospital and proposed that the
high C. jejuni seropositivity could be due to a selection
bias favouring severe cases, as GBS associated with precedent
C. jejuni infection has been reported to be more severe.1,12 Our study was also done at a tertiary care hospital and
this could explain the high C. jejuni seropositivity
in our patients with GBS. The incidence of C.
jejuni diarrhoea reported from India is 4%–5%.
15,16 In
our study, 35% of patients with GBS, 30% of household
controls and none of the hospital controls were seropositive
for C. jejuni. The case–control study by Rees
et al. reported 26% seropositivity in patients, 2%
in household
controls and 1% in hospital controls.12 In the present
study, high rates of seropositivity among household
controls could be due to high rates of C. jejuni
transmission
and infection with suboptimal hygienic conditions
in the respective geographical areas.
M.
pneumoniae seropositivity was found in 55% of
patients with GBS as compared with 25% in household
controls
and 15% in hospital controls. These figures are much
higher
than those reported by others. Jacobs et al.3 reported
M. pneumoniae seropositivity in 5% of patients with
GBS compared with 1% of controls, and Hao et al.
5 reported M.
pneumoniae seropositivity in 2% of patients
with
GBS
as compared with 0.5% of healthy controls. The high
frequency of M. pneumoniae infections in our patients
and controls
could reflect the high frequency of M. pneumoniae in the Indian population, which has been described
previously.17,18
Six patients in our study had a positive serology
for both infectious agents. As suggested by Jacobs
et al.3
this may indicate that a dual antigen-induced immune
response has a role in a subgroup of patients with
GBS. We found that 5 patients did not recall a preceding
episode
of gastroenteritis but were C. jejuni serology positive.
This might be due to asymptomatic infection as described
earlier.5
Porter and Reid. reported 57 asymptomatic
cases among 205 patients in an outbreak of C.
jejuni
infection.19
Similarly, only 5 of 11 patients with M. pneumoniae
seropositivity gave a history of respiratory tract
infection in the
previous 4 weeks.
This preliminary investigation suggests that there
may be an association between recent C. jejuni and
M. pneumoniae
infections in patients with GBS in India.
REFERENCES
- Kaldor J, Speed BR. Guillain–Barré syndrome
and Campylobacter jejuni: A serological study. Br
Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984;288:1867–70.
- Nachamkin I,
Allos BM, Ho T. Campylobacter species and Guillain–Barré syndrome.
Clin Microbiol Rev 1998;11:555–67.
- Jacobs BC, Rothbarth PH, van der Meche
FG, Herbrink P, Schmitz PI, de Klerk MA, et al. The spectrum of antecedent
infections in Guillain–Barré syndrome:
A case–control study. Neurology 1998;51:1110–15.
- Ang CW, Tio-Gillen
AP, Groen J, Herbrink P, Jacobs BC, Van Koningsveld R, et al. Cross-reactive
anti-galactocerebroside antibodies and Mycoplasma
pneumoniae infections in Guillain–Barré syndrome. J
Neuroimmunol 2002;130:179–83.
- Hao Q, Saida T, Kuroki S, Nishimura M, Nukina
M, Obayashi H, et al. Antibodies to gangliosides
and galactocerebroside
in patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome
with preceding Campylobacter jejuni and other identified infections.
J Neuroimmunol 1998;81:116–26.
- Hariharan H, Naseema
K, Kumaran C, Shanmugam J, Nair MD, Radhakrishnan
K. Detection of Campylobacter jejuni/C. coli infection
in patients with
Guillain–Barré syndrome
by serology and culture. New Microbiol 1996;19:267–71.
- Asbury AK, Cornblath DR. Assessment of current diagnostic criteria
for Guillain–Barré syndrome.
Ann Neurol 1990;27 (Suppl):S21–S24.
- Nachamkin I. Campylobacter and Arcobacter. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover
FC, Yolken RH (eds). Manual of clinical microbiology,
7th ed.
Washington, D.C.:American Society for Microbiology; 1999:716–26.
- Blaser MJ, Duncan DJ. Human serum antibody response
to Campylobacter jejuni infection as measured in
an enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay. Infect Immun 1984;44:292–8.
- Barker CE, Sillis M, Wreghitt TG. Evaluation
of Serodia Myco II particle agglutination test for detecting
Mycoplasma pneumoniae antibody:
Comparison
with mu-capture
ELISA and indirect immunofluorescence. J Clin Pathol 1990;43:163–5.
- Baum H, Strubel A, Nollert J, Layh-Schmitt G.
Two cases of fulminant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia
within
4 months.
Infection 2000;28:180–3.
- Rees JH, Soudain SE, Gregson NA, Hughes
RA. Campylobacter jejuni infection and Guillain–Barré syndrome.
N Engl J Med 1995;1333:1374–9.
- Winer JB, Hughes RA,
Anderson MJ, Jones DM, Kangro H, Watkins RP. A
prospective study of acute idiopathic neuropathy.
II.
Antecedent events. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry 1988;51:613–18.
- Emilia-Romagna Study
Group on Clinical and Epidemiological Problems
in Neurology. Campylobacter jejuni infection
and Guillain–Barré syndrome: A case–control
study. Neuroepidemiology 1998;17:296–302.
- Nath G, Shukla BN, Reddy DC, Sanyal SC. A community
study on the aetiology of childhood diarrhoea
with special reference
to
Campylobacter
jejuni in a semiurban slum of Varanasi, India. J
Diarrhoeal Dis Res 1993;11:165–8.
- Prasad KN, Narang P,
Chaturvedi P, Gaind R. Association of Campylobacter
jejuni/coli with childhood diarrhoea.
Indian J
Med Microbiol 1990;29:63–7.
- Pandey A, Chaudhry
R, Nisar N, Kabra SK. Acute respiratory tract
infections in Indian children with
special reference
to Mycoplasma
pneumoniae. J
Trop Pediatr 2000;46:371–4.
- Dey AB, Chaudhry
R, Kumar P, Nisar N, Nagarkar KM. Mycoplasma
pneumoniae and community-acquired
pneumonia.
Natl Med J
India 2000;13:66–70.
- Porter IA, Reid TM. A
milk-borne outbreak of Campylobacter infection.
J Hyg (Lond) 1980;84:415–19.
|