Translate this page into:
Occupational wood dust exposure and lung function impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Correspondence to MANIKANDAN SRINIVASAN; manikandanmbbs06@gmail.com
[To cite: Srinivasan M, Khazi MS, Kolangaredath A, Nayak RR, Ezhil Madhana TP, Beerappa R. Occupational wood dust exposure and lung function impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Natl Med J India. DOI: 10.25259/NMJI_668_2024]
Abstract
Background
Occupational wood dust exposure has been implicated in reduced lung function. Owing to varied estimates from studies, a systematic review was done to evaluate the association between occupational wood dust exposure and decline in lung function.
Methods
This systematic review has been conducted and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were screened. Data were extracted from eligible studies and were considered for qualitative and quantitative synthesis.
Results
The qualitative synthesis included 55 studies. Eligible studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis, and high heterogeneity was noted between studies with I2>95%. Workers exposed to wood dust showed significant reduction in lung function measures, including forced expiratory volume 1 percentage predicted (pooled mean difference [MD] –8.57; 95% CI –12.07 to –5.08; 16 studies), forced vital capacity (FVC) percentage predicted (pooled MD–7.43; 95% CI –11.35 to –3.51; 14 studies), and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) percentage predicted (pooled MD –13.43; 95% CI –25.14 to –1.72; 9 studies). Funnel plot indicated greater chances for publication bias among studies included in the meta-analysis. Sawmill workers were likely to have obstructive lung function patterns compared to furniture industry workers, who present with a restrictive pattern.
Conclusion
Evidence from this review suggests that wood dust-exposed workers have a reduced FEV1, FVC, and PEFR, indicating obstructive and restrictive patterns. There is a need for workplace dust control measures and personal protective equipment to prevent lung function impairment among wood industry workers.
INTRODUCTION
Global burden of disease analysis for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 2019 showed a global prevalence of 10.3% (8.2%–12.8%) in the population between 30–79 years of age.1 Occupational exposure to dust or smoke is a substantial contributor to developing COPD in global settings, resulting in 16.5% (14.6%–18.7%) of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to asthma.1,2 Inhalational exposure to wood dust can occur during the collection and processing of raw wood material and furniture making, thereby resulting in respiratory system-related morbid conditions.3,4
Chemical components in wood dust, such as plicatic acid, monoterpenes, and endotoxin exposure, are implicated in hypersensitization of the pulmonary epithelium. Chronic wood dust exposure results in many respiratory ailments, from allergic manifestations involving the upper respiratory tract to restrictive and obstructive lung pathology, and, in developing cancers involving the sinonasal tract.5–10
While several systematic reviews have established an association between wood dust exposure and upper respiratory tract cancers, there is insufficient pooled evidence to establish a causal link between wood dust and lung function deterioration.3,4,9 Inconclusive results from individual studies based on smaller sample sizes warrant a systematic review of available evidence. This systematic review tests the hypothesis that occupational wood dust exposure is associated with declines in lung function test parameters among wood industry workers.
METHODS
This systematic review was conducted and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020).11 The protocol for this review is registered in PROSPERO under CRD42022346220.
We considered adult males and females exposed to wood dust that is generated during the collection, processing, and manufacture of wood products. Studies reporting wood dust exposure, irrespective of geographical settings, type of wood processed, scale of wood industry (small versus large), were considered. Information on exposure to wood dust was retrieved as reported in the studies, regardless of exposure duration. The unexposed population considered for this review comprised the comparator population reported in studies, including administrative staff associated with wood industries at the study site, other industry settings without wood dust, low levels of dust exposure, or community-based controls.
Outcomes considered for this review include lung function parameters such as forced expiratory volume at first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC ratio. Also, peak expiratory flow (rate) (PEF/PEFR) measurements from spirometry or peak flowmeter were considered as additional outcomes. Study designs considered for the review include cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies. Case studies, case series, narrative reviews, letters to the editor, opinion pieces, and correspondence were excluded.
Literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE database via PubMed and Google Scholar using key words, such as ‘wood dust,’ ‘occupational exposure,’ and ‘pulmonary function tests,’ from the inception until 28 June 2022, followed by a rerun of the literature search on 2 January 2024 for additional articles. Published original research articles retrieved from these databases were imported into the Rayyan software for screening.
Screening of articles
Titles and abstracts were screened in duplicates by two primary reviewers (KMDS and RRN). Studies were screened for eligibility if they included workers employed in occupations generating wood dust and reported performing lung function assessments. A third reviewer (AK) resolved the discrepancies that arose during screening of the title and abstract. Next, the full text of articles was screened to assess exposure setting to wood dust, reporting of at least one lung function parameter, and appropriateness of study design. Records for which full texts were not available for retrieval or were published in languages other than English were excluded. The screening process, along with the reasons for exclusion, are provided in the PRISMA flow diagram (Fig. 1).
Data were extracted from full-text articles screened independently by a team of reviewers (KMDS, RRN, AK, and EM) using a pre-designed data extraction sheet (Google sheet). Following details were extracted: administrative details with name of the first author and year of publication; study details with title, design, setting, participants, controls if any, and sample size; and exposure details such as type and exposure duration, dust concentration measurements, tools for respiratory symptoms and lung function assessment, FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC and PEFR among wood workers and comparator groups, along with measures of summary and deviation. Quality of studies was assessed using an adapted version of the Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scales for cross-sectional and cohort designs, and were scored as high, medium, and low risk of bias as per the scoring manual.12
Data analysis
Study characteristics, including basic demographic details, type of wood, study tools, allergic/respiratory symptoms, and pulmonary function test measurements, were tabulated. Outcome measures of pulmonary function tests were harmonized as mean and standard deviation (SD) using the Cochrane formulae.13 For full-texts, where mean and SD of outcome measures were provided at the subgroup level, a pooled mean and SD were derived using an online statistical calculator for the exposed and unexposed populations.14 Data were analysed using ‘Stata Statistical Software: Release 14 College Station, TX: StataCorp LP’. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model based on the DerSimonian and Laird approach, and the pooled mean difference (with 95% CI) was reported. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the Chi-square test (p<0.05) and I2 statistics. The source of heterogeneity in studies was explored through subgroup analysis of variables such as the type of wood handled by the workers and the risk of bias of the studies.
RESULTS
Study characteristics
This systematic review identified 55 primary studies done across various global settings between 1986 and 2023, which included 8635 wood workers and 5367 controls (Table 1).15–69 Of these, 20 (36.4%) were from Asia, followed by 14 (25.5%) from Europe, and 12 (21.8%) from Africa. All, except one study, had a cross-sectional study design, with Bolund et al., adopting a cohort study design.53 Thirty-seven studies men-tioned the type of wood industry from which workers were recruited. Of these, 21 (56.8%) were from saw mills, and 16 (43.2%) from the furniture industry. Among the unexposed population, 19/55 (34.6%) studies included office staff associated with the respective wood industry as their comparator group.
| S. No. | Author, year | Country | Numberexposed and type of exposure | Wood dust concentration (TD/RD/ID) (in mg/m3) | Number unexposed and type of control | Questionnaire used | Statistically significant allergic and/or respiratory symptoms among wood dust-exposed versus unexposed population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Malo et al.,198615 | Canada | 11 sawmill workers | – | – | – | – |
| 2 | Holmstrom et al., 199116 | Sweden | 45 (16 medium density fibre board+29 wood dust group) | Mean (range) TD: 1.4 (1–2) | 36 controls | – | – |
| 3 | Dahlqvist et al.,199217 | Sweden | 28 sawmill workers | Median TD: 0.26 | 19 office staff | – | – |
| 4 | Johard et al.,199218 | Sweden | 19 sawmill workers | Median (IQR) TD: 0.25 (0.22–0.34) | 25 controls | – | – |
| 5 | Hessel et al.,199519 | Canada | 94 sawmill workers | Mean (range) RD: 1.35 (0.1–2.2) | 165 oil field and gas plant workers | I U T L D | Shortness of breath and wheeze with chest tightness |
| 6 | Chea et al.,199620 | Australia | 45 furniture industry workers | – | 45 office workers | MRC | Common cold, running nose, cough and breathlessness |
| 7 | Eriksson et al.,199621 | Sweden | 48 sawmill workers | Mean (range) TD: 0.3 (0.1–1.1) | – | – | – |
| 8 | Eriksson et al.,199722 | Sweden | 38 pinewood workers | Mean (range) TD: 0.6 (0.1–4.6) | – | – | – |
| 9 | Talini et al.,199823 | Italy | 143 wood workers | Mean (SD) TD: 3.6 (2.7) | 63 assemblers | NHLI | Phlegm production |
| 1 0 | Mandryk et al.,199924 | Australia | 168 wood workers | Range RD: (0.3–0.7) | 30 maintenance workers | BMRC | Cough, phlegm, chronic bronchitis and nasal block |
| 1 1 | Borm et al.,200225 | Indonesia | 87 wood workers with high exposure | Range TD: (5.2–12.3) | 572 wood workers in low dust exposure | – | – |
| 1 2 | Milanowski et al., 200226 | Poland | 48 furniture industry workers | – | 41 office workers | – | – |
| 1 3 | Schlunssen et al.,200227 | Denmark | 2033 wood workers | Mean (SD) ID: 1.19 (0.86) | 474 factory workers with low dust exposure | BMRC | Night wheeze, daily coughing and common cold symptoms |
| 1 4 | Ricciardi et al.,200328 | Italy | 9 wood workers with occupational asthma | – | – | – | – |
| 1 5 | Arbak et al.,200429 | Turkey | 64 furniture industry workers | – | 62 university students | – | Cough, shortness of breath, rhinitis and conjunctivitis |
| 1 6 | Anyabolu et al.,200530 | Nigeria | 400 sawmill workers | – | 200 teaching hospital staff | – | Cough, sputum and nasal stuffiness/sneezing |
| 1 7 | Okwari et al.,200531 | Nigeria | 221 wood workers | Mean (SD) RD: 31.8 (3.4) | 200 office staff | – | Cough, chest pain and nasal irritation |
| 1 8 | Ugheoke et al.,200632 | Nigeria | 150 sawmill workers | – | 150 automobile technicians | MRC | Sputum production, cough, breathlessness, wheeze and chest pain |
| 1 9 | Baran et al.,S_200933 | Poland | 70 furniture industry workers | Range TD: (0.5–18.2) | – | – | – |
| 2 0 | Osman et al.,200934 | Turkey | 328 furniture industry workers | Mean (SD) TD: 2.0 (1.5) | 328 store workers | – | – |
| 2 1 | Boskabady et al.,201035 | Iran | 66 furniture industry workers | – | 66 community participants | Farsi questionnaire | Cough, sputum, sneezing and itchy eyes |
| 2 2 | Mohan et al.,201336 | India | 150 carpenters | – | 150 controls | – | – |
| 2 3 | Sriproed et al.,201337 | Thailand | 46 sawmill workers | Mean (SD) ID: 2.5 (2.3) | 22 workers in low dust settings | ATS | Sneezing and nasal symptoms |
| 2 4 | Thetkathuek et al., 201338 | Thailand | 533 furniture industry workers | Mean (range) TD: 4.1 (1.2–11.2) | 152 office workers | ATS | – |
| 25 | Usman et al., 201339 | India | 30 wood workers | – | 30 shopkeepers | Methods respiratory questionnaire | – |
| 26 | Chatterjee et al., 201440 | India | 90 wood workers | - | - | - | - |
| 27 | Danilova et al., 201441 | Greece | 32 furniture industry | - | 35 0ffice staff | - | - |
| 28 | Das et al., 201442 | Nepal | 50 sawmill workers | - | 100 office staff | – | – |
| 29 | Meo et al., 201443 | Pakistan | 46 wood workers | – | 46 salesmen and shopkeepers | - | - |
| 3 0 | Mumuni et al., 201544 | Ghana | 155 sawmill workers | – | – | Structured respiratory health questionnaire | - |
| 3 1 | Dunga et al.,201645 | Nigeria | 200 sawmill workers | Range TD: (4.4–22.4) | 200 teaching hospital staff | – | – |
| 3 2 | Hussein et al.,201646 | Cairo | 82 wood workers | – | 81 controls | – | – |
| 3 3 | Kulkarny et al., 201647 | India | 50 sawmill workers | – | 50 college Staff | – | – |
| 3 4 | Tobin et al., 201648 | Nigeria | 227 sawmill workers | Mean (SD) ID: 0.3 (0.1) | 277 water bottle company workers | BMRC | Cough with or without phlegm, breathlessness, wheeze, chest pain and chest tightness |
| 35 | Ahmed et al., 201749 | Pakistan | 120 wood workers | – | – | IRWS | – |
| 3 6 | Asia et al.,201750 | India | 60 sawmill workers | – | 65 controls | – | Cough and breathlessness |
| 3 7 | Badirdast et al.,201751 | Iran | 100 chipboard workers | Geometric mean (SD) ID: 19 (2.0) | 50 security guards | – | – |
| 3 8 | Ativie et al., 201852 | Nigeria | 20 sawmill workers | – | 20 controls | NIOSH | – |
| 3 9 | Bolund et al.,201853 | Denmark | 1112 wood workers | – | 235 workers in low–dust settings | – | – |
| 40 | Omole et al., 201854 | Nigeria | 102 sawmill workers | – | 102 college staff | – | – |
| 41 | Ahmed et al., 201955 | Pakistan | 100 carpenter workers | – | – | IRWS | – |
| 4 2 | Asgedom et al., 201956 | Ethiopia | 74 particle board workers | Mean (range) ID: 9.2 (0.5–184) | 73 water bottle company workers | ATS | Cough with sputum, phlegm, wheezing, and shortness of breath |
| 43 | Das et al.,201957 | India | 80 carpenters | – | 70 security guards | MRC | Chest tightness, phlegm, chronic dyspnoea, cough and nasal irritation |
| 4 4 | Fentie et al., 201958 | Ethiopia | 70 wood workers | – | 70 shopkeepers | – | – |
| 45 | Jagtap et al., 201959 | India | 180 sawmill workers | – | 180 office staff | – | – |
| 4 6 | Paraskevaidou et al., 201960 | Greece | 23 wood workers | – | 25 office staff | Respiratory Health Survey Questionnaire for Asthma | Asthma or rhinitis |
| 4 7 | Patil et al., 201961 | India | 60 sawmill workers | – | 60 controls | – | – |
| 48 | Asri et al.,202062 | Malaysia | 41 (17 sawmill and 24 furniture industry workers) | Sawmill worker Median (IQR) ID: 2.4x103 (1.1x103–5.8x103); Furniture worker Median (IQR) ID:1.0 (0.3–6.7) | 39 administrative staff | – | – |
| 4 9 | Hossein et al.,202063 | Iran | 276 wood workers | – | 276 office workers | Respiratory symptoms questionnaire | Cough, phlegm and chest tightness |
| 5 0 | Rasouel et al.,202064 | Egypt | 100 furniture industry workers | Mean (SD) RD: 3.61±2 | 100 relatives of exposed participants | – | Rhinitis, cough, expectoration, wheeze, dyspnoea and asthma |
| 5 1 | Saldanha et al.,202165 | India | 35 sawmill workers | – | 35 community participants | – | – |
| 5 2 | Salman et al.,202166 | Bangladesh | 50 sawmill workers | – | 50 community participants | – | – |
| 53 | Taha et al.,202167 | Egypt | 70 furniture industry workers | 70 controls | – | – | |
| 5 4 | Ennin et al.,202268 | Ghana | 86 wood workers | Range ID: 0.003–1.02 | 89 university staff | MRC | Wheeze, sneeze, cough with or without phlegm, fever, shortness of breath, loss of voice and catarrh |
| 5 5 | Mogal et al.,202269 | Bangladesh | 100 sawmill workers | – | 100 college Staff | ATS and NHLI | Breathlessness, cough, sneeze, chest tightness and itching |
TD total dust/ID inhalable dust/RD respirable dust IUTLD International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease questionnaire MRC Medical Research Council questionnaire NHLI National Heart and Lung Institute Questionnaire BMRC British Medical Research Council Questionnaire ATS American Thoracic Society questionnaire IRWS Institutionalised Respiratory Well-being survey NIOSH-HAI National Institute for Occupational Safety Health Asthma Identification questionnaire IQR Interquartile range
Several studies used tools including the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Medical Research Council, and British Medical Research Council questionnaire to understand allergic and respiratory symptoms among workers. Qualitative synthesis of 20 studies in the review reported a significant increase in the frequency of allergic or respiratory symptoms among wood workers compared with the unexposed population. Respiratory symptoms reported included cough, breathlessness, phlegm production, and chest tightness, while allergic symptoms included wheeze, asthma, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, nasal stuffiness, and itching of skin.
Lung function assessment
FEV1. We considered 16 studies that reported FEV1 in percentage predicted for meta-analysis using a random effects model and estimated a pooled mean difference of –8.57 (95% CI: –12.07 to –5.08) percentage. Wood dust-exposed workers had a significant decline of FEV1 of about 9% compared to controls. A high heterogeneity was observed between the studies (I2=95.26%). Subgroup analysis showed that including studies of varying risk of bias could partly explain the heterogeneity (Tables 2, S1; Figs. 2, S1).18,23–25,29,34,35,38,41,46,47,60,64,67,68
| Lung function | No. of studies included | Pooled mean difference (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| FEV1 L/minute | 22 | –0.37 (–0.49 to –0.26) |
| FEV1 percentage predicted | 16 | –8.57 (–12.07 to –5.08) |
| FVC L/minute | 2 3 | –0.42 (–0.58 to –0.25) |
| FVC percentage predicted | 14 | –7.43 (–11.35 to –3.51) |
| FEV1/FVC | 2 9 | –2.13 (–4.76 to 0.50) |
| PEFR L/minute | 1 6 | –109.4 (–135.34 to –83.47) |
| PEFR percentage predicted | 9 | –13.43 (–25.14 to –1.72) |
FEV1 forced expiratory volume at first second FVC forced vital capacity PEFR peak expiratory flow (rate)
Similarly, 22 studies had complete information on FEV1 in L/minute among wood workers and the comparator group (Table 2). Meta-analysis of 22 studies using a random-effects model showed a pooled mean difference of FEV1 of –0.37 (95% CI: –0.49 to –0.26) L/minute. This indicates that workers exposed to wood dust had a significant reduction in FEV1 by 0.37 L/minute compared to controls. A high heterogeneity was observed between the studies (I2=96.87%). Subgroup analysis showed that varying risk of bias between included studies could partly explain the heterogeneity (Tables 2, S1; Figs. S2a, S2b).
FVC. A random-effects model was used to pool the 14 studies that reported FVC in percentage predicted, showing a significant mean difference of FVC percentage of –7.43 (95% CI –11.35 to –3.51). The wood dust-exposed group showed a statistically significant reduction in FVC percentage compared to unexposed workers. High heterogeneity was observed between the studies (I2=94.73%), and subgroup analysis showed the risk of bias of the studies considered as a probable cause of heterogeneity. Twenty-three studies included in a random-effects meta-analysis showed a pooled mean difference in FVC of –0.42 (95% CI –0.58 to –0.25) L/ minute. The wood dust-exposed group showed a statistically significant reduction in FVC by 0.42 L/minute compared to the unexposed population. A high heterogeneity was noted between the studies, with I2 of 98.76%. Subgroup analysis showed that including studies of varying risk of bias could partly explain the heterogeneity. (Tables 2, S1; Figs. 3, S3a, S3b, S4).23–25,29,34,35,38,41,46,60,63,64,67,68
FEV1/FVC. Twenty-nine studies reported the FEV1/FVC across wood-exposed and unexposed populations (Table 2). However, meta-analysis using random effects model showed that there was no statistically significant reduction of FEV1/ FVC (mean difference –2.13; 95% CI: –4.76 to 0.50) among wood workers compared to the unexposed population (Tables 2 and S1; Figs. S5a and S5b). Subgroup analysis by wood dust type showed that sawmill workers had a significant decline in FEV1/FVC ratio by 5.4 units. Given that sawmill workers also had a decline in FEV1, it is plausible that they were more likely to have an obstructive lung function pattern (Figs. S1b, S5b). In contrast, furniture industry workers did not present with reduced FEV1/FVC in the subgroup analysis. By factoring in this observation along with the presence of significant FVC reduction among furniture workers, it is inferred that furniture workers tend to be more likely to present a restrictive pattern (Figs. S5b, S3a, S3b).
Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR)
Meta-analysis of 9 studies that reported predicted PEFR percentage showed that wood dust-exposed workers had a reduction in predicted PEFR percentage by 13.43 compared with the unexposed population (pooled mean difference: –13.43; 95% CI –25.14 to –1.72). Subgroup analysis revealed that the risk of bias of the included studies could partially explain the heterogeneity in the meta-analysis estimate. Sixteen studies reported PEFR values in L/minute among wood-exposed and comparator groups. Meta-analysis of 16 studies showed a pooled mean difference of –109.4 (95% CI –135.34 to –83.47) L/minute, indicating a reduction in PEFR by 109.4 L/minute among the wood dust-exposed group compared to the control. High heterogeneity (I2=98.63%) was noted between the studies, and subgroup analysis did not identify any potential variable that resulted in heterogeneity. (Tables 2, S2; Figs. 4, S6a, S6b, S7).
Risk of bias
Risk of bias assessment for the 55 studies included in this review showed that most (47, 85.46%) were at high risk of bias. Fewer studies were rated as medium and low risk of bias, including 5 (9.09%) and 3 (5.46%), respectively (Tables S1 and S2).
Publication bias
Funnel plots of various outcomes related to lung function tests and peak expiratory flow rate showed asymmetry, suggesting publication bias among the studies included in this meta-analysis (Figs. S8a–S8f).
DISCUSSION
This systematic review, conducted across studies involving wood workers from diverse settings worldwide, demonstrated a significant reduction in lung function parameters compared with the unexposed population. We found a statistically significant reduction in FEV1, FVC, and PEFR, indicating that lung function impairment among wood workers could be of both obstructive and restrictive patterns. Our meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity among the studies, likely reflecting variability in population, dust exposure, and methods of outcome assessment. Most of the studies in the systematic review were at high risk of bias. Subgroup analysis, including risk of bias and the type of wood handled by the workers, could partly explain the heterogeneity in the meta-analysis estimates.
A recent systematic review has pooled evidence from longitudinal studies related to lung function decline following exposure to mineral or biological dust in occupational settings.70 This analysis has shown that workers classified as ‘ever’ being exposed, as well as those with ‘cumulative’ exposure to dust, present with a significant decline in FEV1 estimates.70 This is similar to our review that reported FEV1 reduction in the wood dust-exposed group compared to the unexposed population, while measured in both L/minute and percentages. Considering these findings, another systematic review highlighted a greater risk of about 1.5 times to develop asthma following wood dust exposure compared to the unexposed population and provided supportive evidence for a dose-response relationship for the association between dust exposure and risk of asthma.3
Similar to wood dust, occupational exposure to quartz (silica) dust has been implicated in developing obstructive pattern in lung function with a reduction in pooled FEV1 percentage predicted by 4.62 points in a systematic review of cross-sectional studies.71 While our review observed a similar reduction in FEV1 to that of the review on quartz exposure, it is important to note that this review did not find a significant reduction in FEV1/FVC ratio.71 Despite both the reviews synthesizing cross-sectional evidence, the lack of reduction in FEV1/FVC ratio in our review could be influenced by differing exposure characteristics across studies, because of including participants from the sawmill and furniture industries. Subgroup analyses in this review showed that sawmill workers were more likely to have an obstructive pattern (reduced FEV1 and FEV1/FVC) compared to furniture workers, who were more likely to have a restrictive pattern (reduced FVC alone). The lack of significance in the overall FEV1/FVC meta-analysis could be due to the pooling of studies that included sawmill as well as furniture industry workers together in a single meta-analysis, where the individual effect of each of these groups tends towards the opposite direction, leaving the summary estimate around the line of no effect.
Our review identified a significant reduction in FVC in wood-exposed workers compared to controls, indicating a restrictive lung function impairment. A similar restrictive pathology due to occupational exposure to wood dust has been reported in a systematic review, which found that wood dust exposure was associated with a 62% higher risk of being diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis compared to controls.72
We also identified a significant reduction in PEFR measurements among wood workers compared to controls. This could probably reflect airflow obstruction due to the irritant effect of inhaled wood dust, resulting in an asthma presentation. This finding is supported by a systematic review by Zhang et al, where exposure to organic dust, such as wood, resulted in 1.62 times higher chances of presenting with asthma compared to controls.73
This systematic review has several limitations as it synthesized evidence from observational study designs that are prone to bias, although these are ideal for measuring the association between risk factors and disease. Of the potential confounders that could affect the association between wood dust exposure and lung function in our meta-analysis, the type of wood dust and the risk of bias of included studies were considered in the subgroup meta-analysis. Insufficient information on the duration of exposure to wood dust and smoking habits precluded inclusion of these variables in the subgroup meta-analysis. This review identified most studies as cross-sectional, except for a single cohort study from Denmark. This review identifies a potential research gap in understanding the natural progression of lung disease following wood dust exposure through cohort studies.
Given substantial evidence linking wood dust exposure to lung function impairment, adopting workplace dust-limiting measures, such as substitutions and improved ventilation to replace air contaminated with dust, is important. In India, early identification of workers with lung impairment through periodic medical examinations in organized industrial settings, as well as bringing workers under the umbrella of medical insurance coverage under the Employee Insurance Scheme, must be prioritized.
Conclusion
We found a deterioration in lung function measurements such as FEV1, FVC and PEFR among wood dust-exposed workers, pointing towards obstructive as well as restrictive lung function patterns. Sawmill workers are likely to have an obstructive lung function pattern, whereas furniture industry workers present with a restrictive pattern. This evidence emphasises the need to adopt preventive measures, such as workplace engineering modifications and promoting the use of personal protective equipment among wood workers, along with periodic screening of workers to reduce health impacts from wood exposure.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We acknowledge Dr Geethu Mathew for her inputs during protocol development of this systematic review.
Conflicts of interest
None declared
References
- Global,regional, and national prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic obstructivepulmonary disease (COPD) in 2019: A systematic review and modellinganalysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2022;10:447-58.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years,and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease andasthma, 1990-2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of DiseaseStudy 2015. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5:691-706.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asthma in furniture and woodprocessing workers: A systematic review. Occup Med (Oxf). 2016;66:193-201.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Occupational exposure and sinonasalcancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:49.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pulmonary function and symptoms in workers exposed to wooddust. Thorax. 1992;47:84-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Consequences of occupational asthma on employment and financial status: Afollow-up study. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:55-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Identifying risk factors for COPD and adult-onset asthma:An umbrella review. Eur Respir Rev. 2023;32:1-18.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood dust: An occupational hazard which increases the riskof respiratory disease. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007;58:43-50.
- [Google Scholar]
- Occupational exposureto wood dust and risk of nasopharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Environ Res. 2019;171:170-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood dust and formaldehyde. International Agency for Research on Cancer1995. Available at https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Iarc-Monographs-On-The-Identification-Of-Carcinogenic-Hazards-To-Humans/Wood-Dust-And-Formaldehyde-1995 (accessed on 7 Apr 2024)
- [Google Scholar]
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reportingsystematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals and anthropometric measures ofobesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e033509.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2024. Cochrane. Available at https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current (accessed on 6 Apr 2024)
- [Google Scholar]
- Home page. 2024. Statstodo. Available at www.statstodo.com/index.php (accessed on 6 Apr 2024)
- [Google Scholar]
- Occupational asthma in sawmills of easternCanada and United States. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986;78:392-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Symptoms, airway physiology andhistology of workers exposed to medium-density fiber board. Scand J WorkEnviron Health. 1991;17:409-13.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lung function and precipitating antibodies in low exposed wood trimmersin Sweden. Am J Ind Med. 1992;21:549-59.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Signs of alveolar inflammation in non-smoking Swedish wood trimmers. BrJ Ind Med. 1992;49:428-34.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lung health in sawmill workers exposed to pine and spruce. Chest. 1995;108:642-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A comparative study of the respiratory system of wood-workers andoffice-workers together with their smoking habits in Darwin. Northern Territory. 2024. Charles Darwin University. Available at https://researchers.cdu.edu.au/en/studentTheses/a-comparative-study-of-the-respiratory-system-of-woodworkers-and (accessed on 6 Apr 2024)
- [Google Scholar]
- Terpeneexposure and respiratory effects among sawmill workers. Scand J Work EnvironHealth. 1996;22:182-90.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terpene exposure and respiratory effects among workers inSwedish joinery shops. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997;23:114-20.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asthma-like symptoms, atopy, and bronchial responsiveness in furniture workers. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55:786-91.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Work-related symptoms and dose-responserelationships for personal exposures and pulmonary function among woodworkers. Am J Ind Med. 1999;35:481-90.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Respiratory symptoms, lung function, and nasal cellularity in Indonesian woodworkers: A dose-response analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59:338-44.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Work-related symptoms among furniture factory workers inLublin region (eastern Poland) Ann Agric Environ Med. 2002;9:99-103.
- [Google Scholar]
- Respiratorysymptoms and lung function among Danish wood workers. J Occup EnvironMed. 2002;44:82-98.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Occupational asthma due to exposure to iroko wood dust. Ann Allergy AsthmaImmunol. 2003;91:393-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Respiratorysymptoms and peak expiratory flow rates among furniture-decoration students. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2004;11:13-17.
- [Google Scholar]
- Respiratory symptoms and ventilatory function tests in sawmillworkers in Nnewi, south-east Nigeria. 2024. Rayyan. Available at https://rayyan.ai/fulltexts/1612323 (accessed on 6 Apr 2024)
- [Google Scholar]
- Lung function status ofworkers exposed to wood dust in timber markets in Calabar, Nigeria. Afr J MedMed Sci. 2005;34:141-5.
- [Google Scholar]
- Influence of smoking on respiratorysymptoms and lung function indices in sawmill workers in Benin City, Nigeria. Niger J Physiol Sci. 2006;21:49-54.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lung function: Occupational exposure to wooddust. Eur J Med Res. 2009;14:14-17.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Occupational exposure to wood dust and health effects on therespiratory system in a minor industrial estate in Bursa, Turkey. Int J OccupMed Environ Health. 2009;22:43-50.
- [Google Scholar]
- Work-relatedrespiratory symptoms and pulmonary function tests in northeast Iranian (thecity of Mashhad) carpenters. Clinics. 2010;65:1003-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effect of wood dust on respiratory health statusof carpenters. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:1589-91.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Respiratory effects among rubberwood furniture factory workers inThailand. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2013;68:87-94.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rubberwood dust and lung function among Thai furniture factoryworkers. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2010;16:69-74.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Effect of duration and severity of exposure on peak expiratory flowrate among workers exposed to wood dust in central India (Nagpur) Int J SciRes. 2017;6:37-40.
- [Google Scholar]
- Evaluation of cardiovascular and pulmonary stresses of carpentersin relation to their professional experience. 2024. Academia.edu. Available at www.academia.edu/32393158/EVALUATION_OF_CARDIOVASCULAR_AND_PULMONARY_STRESSES_OF_CARPENTERS_IN_RELATION_TO_THEIR_PROFESSIONAL_EXPERIENCE (accessed on 6 Apr 2024)
- [Google Scholar]
- Respiratory symptoms and ventilatory function in never-smokingmales working in dusty occupations. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2020;8:1-6. Available at https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2014.116 (accessed on 6 Apr 2024)
- [Google Scholar]
- Occupational exposure and pulmonary function of workers of carpet industriesand sawmills, Lalitpur, Nepal. Asian J Med Sci. 2014;5:54-8.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lung function in Pakistani wood workers. Int J Environ Health Res2006;. ;16:193-203.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Respiratory health problems among sawmill workers at the timbermarket. 2015. Accra. Semantic Scholar. Available at www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Respiratory-Health-Problems-Among-Sawmill-Workers-Mumuni/4bc13fc78c093a031d32488f34d37ad4bb15894f (accessed on 6 Apr 2024)
- [Google Scholar]
- FEV,FVC, FEV/FVC as predictors of rhinitis among sawmill workers in north centralNigeria. Niger J Med. 2016;25:152-8.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Associationof ADAM33 gene polymorphism and arginase activity with susceptibility toventilatory impairment in wood dust-exposed workers. Hum Exp Toxicol2016;. ;35:966-73.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A study of dynamic lung function tests in sawmill workers ofBijapur city. 2024. ProQuest. Available at www.proquest.com/openview/97db489512b05723f8e57bd0775bc347/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2028903 (accessed on 6 Apr 2024)
- [Google Scholar]
- Occupational exposure to wood dust and respiratory health statusof sawmill workers in South-South Nigeria. J Pollut Eff Control. 2015;4:1-6.
- [Google Scholar]
- Lung function comparisonbetween wood workers and stone crushers by spirometry. Asian J Basic HealthPharm. 2017;1:1-12.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of wood dust exposure on respiratory function among carpenters. Int J Basic Appl Med Res. 2017;7:336-40.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of wood aerosols and bioaerosols on the respiratory systems ofwood manufacturing industry workers in Golestan province. Tanaffos2017;. ;16:53-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Cardio-pulmonary risk markers inautomobile sprayers and saw millers. Afr J Clin Res. 2018;1:1-8.
- [Google Scholar]
- New-onsetCOPD and decline in lung function among wood dust-exposed workers: Reanalysisof a 6-year follow-up study. Ann Work Expo Health. 2018;62:1064-76.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Respiratory function of sawmill workers andtheir relationship to duration of exposure to wood dust in Nigeria. J EnvironOccup Sci. 2018;7:9-16.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lung function comparisonby the technique of spirometry between different working groups of Pakistan: Across-sectional survey-based study. RADS J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2019;7:97-106.
- [Google Scholar]
- High prevalence of respiratory symptomsamong particleboard workers in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. Int J EnvironRes Public Health. 2019;16:2-10.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prevalence of respiratory symptoms and respiratory disorders amongcarpenters in India. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 2020;48:83-91.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect ofoccupational wood dust on pulmonary function among wood workers in JimmaTown, southwest Ethiopia: A comparative cross-sectional study. Ethiop J HealthSci. 2019;8:587-93.
- [Google Scholar]
- A comparative study of lung function among sawmillworkers in central India. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2019;8:769-73.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Asthma and rhinitis in Greek furniture workers. J Asthma. 2021;58:170-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effect of occupational exposure to dust on pulmonaryfunction tests in individuals working in saw mills in Raichur district. IndianJ Clin Anat Physiol. 2019;6:77-80.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Inhalable dust exposure and lung function among rice mill, sawmill and furniturefactory workers. Mal J Med Health Sci. 2020;16:49-55.
- [Google Scholar]
- Prevalence of respiratory symptoms and spirometric changes among non-smokermale wood workers. PLoS One. 2020;15:1-10.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Respiratoryhealth disorders among workers in joinery workshops. Egypt J Occup Med2021;. ;45:17-32.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Effect of chronic exposure of wood dust onserum malondialdehyde and C-reactive protein in sawmill workers and theircorrelation with pulmonary function parameters. 2021. Semantics Scholar. Available at www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Effect-of-chronic-exposure-ofwood-dust-on-serum-C-Saldanha-D'souza/28d5b7ab6ac33a0fc4206485ebc9f741c583ad32 (accessed on 6 Apr 2024)
- [Google Scholar]
- Effects of wood dusts on PEFR in exposed maleworkers. Res Gate. 2021;7:35-9. Available at www.researchgate.net/publication/351230183_Effects_of_Wood_Dusts_on_PEFR_in_Exposed_Male_Workers (accessed on 6 Apr 2024)
- [Google Scholar]
- Association of microsomalepoxide hydrolase gene (fast genotype) with lung function impairment in woodworkers. J Complement Integr Med. 2021;18:609-15.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pulmonary functionassessment of wood workers exposed to mixed tropical hardwood dust in Kumasi. Preprint. 2022;2:1-8. Available at https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1404710/v2 (accessed on 6 Apr 2024)
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Impact of wood dust on pulmonary function and blood immunoglobulin E,erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein: A cross-sectional studyamong sawmill workers in Tangail, Bangladesh. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5:646-53.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ever andcumulative occupational exposure and lung function decline in longitudinalpopulation-based studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup EnvironMed. 2023;80:51-60.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Respirable quartz dustexposure and airway obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. OccupEnviron Med. 2014;71:583-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Occupational and environmental risk factors ofidiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep2021;. ;11:4318-28.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Association betweenorganic dust exposure and adult asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysisof case-control studies. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2019;11:818-29.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]