Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Filter by Categories
Acknowledgements
Book Review
Book Reviews
Classics In Indian Medicine
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Case Reports
CLINICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Clinico-pathological Conference
Conferences
Correspondence
Editorial
Eminent Indians in Medicine
Errata
Erratum
Everyday Practice
Film Review
History of Medicine
HOW TO DO IT
Images In Medicine
Letter from Bristol
Letter from Chennai
Letter From Ganiyari
Letter from Glasgow
Letter from London
Letter From Mumbai
Letter From Nepal
Masala
Medical Education
Medical Ethics
Medicine and Society
News From Here And There
Notices
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Review Article
SELECTED SUMMARIES
Selected Summary
Short Report
Short Reports
Speaking for Myself
Speaking for Ourselve
Speaking for Ourselves
Students@nmji
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Medicine and Society
2018:31:2;103-104
doi: 10.4103/0970-258X.253146
PMID: 30829228

Absence of a formal long-term healthcare system for a rapidly ageing population is likely to create a crisis situation in the near future

Ashish Goel1 , Anurag Snehi Ramavat2
1 Department of Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences, University of Delhi, Dilshad Garden, New Delhi 110095, India
2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India

Corresponding Author:
Ashish Goel
Department of Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences, University of Delhi, Dilshad Garden, New Delhi 110095
India
ashgoe@gmail.com
How to cite this article:
Goel A, Ramavat AS. Absence of a formal long-term healthcare system for a rapidly ageing population is likely to create a crisis situation in the near future. Natl Med J India 2018;31:103-104
Copyright: (C)2018 The National Medical Journal of India

Introduction

Over the past few decades, the population pyramid of India has acquired a relatively narrower base, becoming increasingly top- heavy. It should sound alarm bells for the country due to the unique relationship between its healthcare delivery systems and sociocultural structure. Conventionally, large joint families take care of older parents and relatives. Over the past century, smaller families have become the norm and the joint family systems have become increasingly nuclear.[1],[2] While the average size of the Indian household was 5.5 in 1991, it is now estimated that 56% households have <4 members.[3]·[4] The share of older individuals in the Indian population has also increased progressively. It is expected to rise from 8% in 2010 to 19% in the next three decades.[5] Consequently, the elderly dependency ratio of India has increased from 6 to 8 as reported over the past two decades and is expected to rise to 11 per 100 in the next decade.[6] An increasing share of older individuals on a background of changing family structure, limited social and financial support is expected to unfold harsh health policy challenges. We highlight that in the absence of long-term care facilities, in the context of a rapidly expanding older population, the Indian healthcare system is staring at a not-too-distant collapse. While some developed countries have time-tested long-term care systems, these cannot be directly implemented to Indian sociocultural contexts.[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12] We also suggest areas for further exploration.

Methods

An initial PubMed search in August 2016 for long-term care facilities or models in India using keywords ‘term care’ and India identified 67 citations. None addressed models or facilities of long-term care, but we identified five that were relevant for our review.[13],[14],[15],[16],[17]

A search using ‘long term care’ and ‘model’ identified 1997 publications. Limiting keywords to appear in the titles of English articles, we identified 109 articles. Articles that were screened for relevance and those found too focused, relating to particular diseases, or too broad, were excluded. The abstracts of 55 articles were reviewed and 16 were identified for further examination. Data were collected on the nature of long-term care model, the cost of implementation and the advantages and disadvantages of each model.

Agreement and Disagreement in Literature

Among the reviewed literature, there is considerable agreement that the nursing home-based model of long-term care delivery is not the ideal approach and is riddled with problems in terms of coordination, financing, fragmentation, long-term sustainability and end-user dissatisfaction.[18],[19],[20] It has been felt that medical facility-based care model results in neglect of elders, the individuals whom these institutions were set up to care for. Options for ageing in place (home care models) with community participation are not only less expensive but also more attractive to elderly end-users, prevent inappropriate hospital admissions, improve quality of life and decrease dependence on private resources.[9],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25]

There is little agreement on the nature and methodology for an ideal long-term care delivery system. However, there is a definitive shift towards an integrated system of acute and long-term care for frail older people with multiple comorbid conditions and disabilities requiring assistance in more than one activity of daily living.[22] Systems such as Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) that integrate community participation and focus on home-based care are becoming increasingly popular.[826] The role of personal care and social care within the home care models also remains controversial.[27] In addition, the role of providing the long-term benefits in cash as against the indemnity model has not been adequately addressed.[28]

Analysis of Strength/Quality

We did not find any systematic review or meta-analysis that has reviewed the quality and advantages of long-term care systems across the world. Most articles are observational studies and non- systematic reviews of published literature. We used only the PubMed database and cross-references from articles, and the use of other databases may strengthen the content further.

Gaps in Literature

We did not find a systematic study on long-term care in India, and there is considerable ambiguity in the terminology of long-term care and nursing home care in the literature across the world.[29] In addition, the role of integration of social or personal care with long-term healthcare has not been adequately addressed. The possibility of linking long-term benefits to a cash-based incentive model needs further exploration.

Conclusion

Our review emphasizes that in the face of a rapidly ageing population, it is essential that a system of long-term care should be established. An inclusive system integrating facility-based institutions with home and community care developed upholding autonomy of the participant and promoting cost-ownership approach, which is not only self-sufficient but also self-sustained, will be a crucial healthcare challenge for the policy-makers in India.

Conflicts of interest None declared

References
1.
Sehgal M. Damned and depressed. Health Millions 1992;18:14-17.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Choudhury RD. Joint family system—its present and future. Econ Wkly 1957;9: 1233-6.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Average household size in India. Available at www.arcgis.com/home/ item.html?id=6cf22970ea8c4b338al96879397a76e4 (accessed on 31 Oct 2017).
[Google Scholar]
4.
Normal households by household size; 2001. Available at www.censusindia.gov.in/ D a ta_P rodu cts/Data_Highligh ts/D a ta_Highligh ts_li nk/data_highlights_h hl_ 2_3.pdf (accessed on 31 Oct 2017).
[Google Scholar]
5.
India’s aging population. Population Reference Bureau; 2012. Available at www.prb.org/pdf12/TodaysResearchAging25.pdf (accessed on 31 Oct 2017).
[Google Scholar]
6.
Age structure and marital status. Office of Registrar General and Census Commissioner. India; 2011. Available at www.censusindia.gov.in/Census_And_You/age_structure_ and_marital_status.aspx (accessed on 1 Aug 2016).
[Google Scholar]
7.
Harrington CA, Geraedts M, Heller GV. Germany’s long-term care insurance model: Lessons for the United States. J Public Health Policy 2002;23:44-65.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Mui AC. The program of all-inclusive care for the elderly (PACE): An innovative long-term care model in the United States. J Aging Soc Policy 2001 ;13:53-67.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Ricciardi G. The Italian model for long-term care. Health Care Manag 1997;3: 167–76.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Marshall EG, Boudreau MA, Jensen JL, Edgecombe N, Clarke B, Burge F, et al. A new long-term care facilities model in Nova Scotia, Canada: Protocol for a mixed methods study of care by design. JMIR Res Protoc 2013;2:e56.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Marshall EG, Clarke B, Peddle S, Jensen J. Care by design: New model of coordinated on-site primary and acute care in long-term care facilities. Can Fam Physician 2015;61:e129–34.
[Google Scholar]
12.
Igarashi A, Ishibashi T, Shinozaki T, Yamamoto-Mitani N. Combinations of longterm care insurance services and associated factors in Japan: A classification tree model. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:382.
[Google Scholar]
13.
Crosbie JM. LTC in the third world. J GerontolNurs 1989;15:6–10.
[Google Scholar]
14.
Deshmukh PR, Dongre AR, Rajendran K, Kumar S. Role of social, cultural and economic capitals in perceived quality of life among old age people in Kerala, India. Indian J Palliat Care 2015;21:39-44.
[Google Scholar]
15.
Rajalakshmi B, Shinu SJ. Long term care. Nurs J India 2013;104:104–5.
[Google Scholar]
16.
Roy S, Chakrabortti SC. Will active ageing make the difference? J Indian Med Assoc 1999;97:115-16.
[Google Scholar]
17.
Thapa K, Rowland LA. Quality of life perspectives in long-term care: Staff and patient perceptions. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1989;80:267-71.
[Google Scholar]
18.
Arnold D. The brokerage model of long-term care: A rose by any other name. Home Health Care Serv Q 1987;8:23–43.
[Google Scholar]
19.
Henry J. Human obsolescence: Culture against man. New York:Vintage Books; 1965:371–93.
[Google Scholar]
20.
Ziemba R, Perry TE, Takahashi B, Algase D. ‘That model is sooooo last millennium! ' residential long term care as a system, not a place. J Hous Elderly 2008;23:261-80.
[Google Scholar]
21.
Weissert WG, Cready CM. A prospective budgeting model for home- and community- based long-term care. Inquiry 1989;26:116–29.
[Google Scholar]
22.
Bodenheimer T. Long-term care for frail elderly people—The On Lok model. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1324-8.
[Google Scholar]
23.
Marek KD, Rantz MJ. Aging in place: A new model for long-term care. NursAdm Q 2000;24:1-11.
[Google Scholar]
24.
Fisher HM, Raphael TG. Building home care into managed long-term care: The VNS CHOICE model. Caring 2000;19:8–11.
[Google Scholar]
25.
White-Chu EF, Graves WJ, Godfrey SM, Bonner A, Sloane P. Beyond the medical model: The culture change revolution in long-term care. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2009;10:370-8.
[Google Scholar]
26.
Rich ML. The PACE model: Description and impressions of a capitated model of long-term care for the elderly. Care Manag J 1999;1:62-70.
[Google Scholar]
27.
Batavia AI. A right to personal assistance services: ‘Most integrated setting appropriate’ requirements and the independent living model of long-term care. Am J Law Med 2001;27:17–3.
[Google Scholar]
28.
Stone RI. Providing long-term care benefits in cash: Moving to a disability model. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20:96–108.
[Google Scholar]
29.
Sanford AM, Orrell M, Tolson D, Abbatecola AM, Arai H, Bauer JM, et al. An international definition for “nursing home”. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015;16:181–4.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
5

PDF downloads
1
Show Sections