Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Acknowledgements
Authors’ reply
Book Review
Book Reviews
Classics In Indian Medicine
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Case Reports
Clinical Research Methods
Clinico-pathological Conference
Clinicopathological Conference
Conferences
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Eminent Indians in Medicine
Errata
Erratum
Everyday Practice
Film Review
History of Medicine
HOW TO DO IT
Images In Medicine
Indian Medical Institutions
Letter from Bristol
Letter from Chennai
Letter From Ganiyari
Letter from Glasgow
Letter from London
Letter from Mangalore
Letter From Mumbai
Letter From Nepal
Masala
Medical Education
Medical Ethics
Medicine and Society
News From Here And There
Notice of Retraction
Notices
Obituaries
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Review Article
Selected Summaries
Selected Summary
Short Report
Short Reports
Speaking for Myself
Speaking for Ourselve
Speaking for Ourselves
Students@nmji
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Acknowledgements
Authors’ reply
Book Review
Book Reviews
Classics In Indian Medicine
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Case Reports
Clinical Research Methods
Clinico-pathological Conference
Clinicopathological Conference
Conferences
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Eminent Indians in Medicine
Errata
Erratum
Everyday Practice
Film Review
History of Medicine
HOW TO DO IT
Images In Medicine
Indian Medical Institutions
Letter from Bristol
Letter from Chennai
Letter From Ganiyari
Letter from Glasgow
Letter from London
Letter from Mangalore
Letter From Mumbai
Letter From Nepal
Masala
Medical Education
Medical Ethics
Medicine and Society
News From Here And There
Notice of Retraction
Notices
Obituaries
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Review Article
Selected Summaries
Selected Summary
Short Report
Short Reports
Speaking for Myself
Speaking for Ourselve
Speaking for Ourselves
Students@nmji
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
37 (
6
); 358-359
doi:
10.25259/NMJI_950_2024

Opioid use disorder: Long-term use of oral naltrexone for promoting abstinence

Department of Psychiatry, National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

[To cite: Kabra V, Jadeer M, Sarkar S. Opioid use disorder: Long-term use of oral naltrexone for promoting abstinence. Natl Med J India 2024;37: 358–9. DOI: 10.25259/NMJI_950_2024]

Naltrexone is an opioid antagonist that has clinical potential for use in patients with opioid dependence. While long-term use of opioid agonists such as buprenorphine and methadone has been well described, there is a lack of evidence of the long-term outcomes of patients being put on naltrexone.1,2 We describe a patient with opioid dependence who has been treated with oral naltrexone for about 8 years.

An 18-year-old male came to us in 2016 with opioid, cannabis, and tobacco dependence for 6 months, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively. He had behavioural disturbances, muttering to self, sexually inappropriate behaviour, and grandiosity for 6 months at the time of presentation. He was detoxified and started on oral naltrexone 50 mg per day (based on stated preference for opioid-free lifestyle), and olanzapine 10 mg was started for psychiatric symptoms which were remitted. Over the next 3 years, he did not relapse back to opioid regular use, though he stopped naltrexone for 5–6 days and tried heroin on 2 such occasions. However, each time his parents were vigilant and brought him to the outpatient services to restart naltrexone. Later, he tried heroin on 3–4 occasions but did not experience a high on consuming it as he was on regular naltrexone, supervised properly by family members. In 2017 he again had heightened psychomotor activity, decreased need for sleep, grandiose ideation, verbal and physical aggression toward family members, as well as muttering, giggling, and sexual disinhibition. The onset of symptoms was not related to the use of any specific substance such as cannabis. He was admitted, olanzapine was started and resolution of symptoms occurred in 14 days. Naltrexone was continued. Subsequently, in 2018, he presented with delusions of reference and persecution, followed by social withdrawal and then catatonia. Again, olanzapine 10 mg was started and the patient improved over the course of 5 weeks. An additional diagnosis of schizophrenia was the most tenable based on the psychiatric history.

The patient over the course of time took oral naltrexone and olanzapine regularly (Fig. 1). He was gainfully engaged in the family business, changed peer groups to avoid substance-using peers, and joined a gymnasium to pay attention to his physical health. He relapsed to regular cannabis use subsequently and was admitted for a period ranging from 7 to 10 days for cessation of cannabis on four occasions between 2019 and 2023. He was admitted in 2024 when he reported consuming alcohol very frequently (5–6 drinks, 3–4 times a week) and acknowledging gradually losing control over drinking. His admission helped in the cessation of alcohol use, and again the possibility of stopping naltrexone was discussed. Even after 5 years of complete abstinence from opioid use, the patient willingly wanted to continue using oral naltrexone regularly, as he felt it safeguarded him against situations of peer influence and negative emotional state when he was likely to relapse. Regular use of olanzapine also seemingly ensured a lack of recurrence of psychotic symptoms. This suggests that stability in cases of psychosis can be effectuated with good compliance to antipsychotics. Dual diagnosis, i.e. the co-occurrence of substance use disorder and psychiatric disorder is a common occurrence in the clinical setting.

Life course of the patient
FIG 1.
Life course of the patient

This case illustrates that long-term naltrexone can help some patients on their road to recovery from opioid use disorders. Naltrexone is reported as the fourth most effective treatment option for the treatment of opioid use disorder.3 Naltrexone is a particularly suitable option for patients who require an opioid-free lifestyle.4,5 This case also highlights the importance of retention in treatment, supervision by family members, and the potential of naltrexone in achieving and sustaining abstinence from opioids. By providing effective treatment and support, we can help individuals reclaim their functional lives and respect in society and overcome the challenges of living with addiction.

References

  1. , , , , . Long term outcomes of pharmacological treatments for opioid dependence: Does methadone still lead the pack? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;77:272-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Treatment retention among patients randomized to buprenorphine/naloxone compared to methadone in a multi-site trial. Addiction. 2014;109:79-87.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Relative effectiveness of medications for opioid-related disorders: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0266142.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Naltrexone for probationers and parolees. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;31:107-11.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Successful use of naltrexone in addicted physicians and business executives. Adv Alcohol Subst Abuse. 1984;4:89-96.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
3,218

PDF downloads
674
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections