Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Book Reviews
Classics In Indian Medicine
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Case Reports
Clinical Research Methods
Clinico-pathological Conference
Eminent Indians in Medicine
Everyday Practice
Film Review
History of Medicine
Images In Medicine
Indian Medical Institutions
Letter from Bristol
Letter from Chennai
Letter From Ganiyari
Letter from Glasgow
Letter from London
Letter From Mumbai
Letter From Nepal
Medical Education
Medical Ethics
Medicine and Society
News From Here And There
Original Article
Original Articles
Review Article
Selected Summaries
Selected Summary
Short Report
Short Reports
Speaking for Myself
Speaking for Ourselve
Speaking for Ourselves
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

doi: 10.4103/0970-258X.291304
PMID: 32769259

A universal manuscript for all medical journals

Sanjay A Pai1 , Madhukar Pai2
1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Columbia Asia Referral Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 McGill Global Health Programs, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Corresponding Author:
Sanjay A Pai
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Columbia Asia Referral Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka
Published: 01-Aug-2020
How to cite this article:
Pai SA, Pai M. A universal manuscript for all medical journals. Natl Med J India 2019;32:254
Copyright: (C)2019 The National Medical Journal of India

It is a source of much frustration to authors that medical journals have vastly different submission requirements.[1] These differences span the whole spectrum: from the need for each journal to have a unique login/ password to differing word-counts for the abstract to a mind-numbing array of referencing styles. To make matters worse, each journal has its own set of author forms and signatures. In 2019, it is incredible that some journals still insist on wet signatures!

None of these issues have any bearing on the quality of the research work, and addressing these for each submission is a tremendous drain on researchers’ time and energies. It is hard to understand why editors and publishers cannot agree on a universal manuscript with one common login, one reference style, submitted as a single file upload, with zero signatures or forms at the time of initial submission.

Once a manuscript is deemed worthy of revision or acceptance, publishers could demand their own unique house style for the formatting and production and could ask the authors to upload forms, etc. While organizations such as the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) could take the lead and create a universal manuscript template for all medical journals, we would like to see a journal like the The National Medical Journal of India advocate this idea, whose time has come.

The medical publishing industry is having a challenging time,[2],[3] and it is important for medical editors and publishers to tune into the needs of the research community. Otherwise, they run the risk of alienating their most critical stakeholders.

Conflicts of interest. None declared

Pai M. Dear Editor (An authors’ wish list to medical journal editors). Nature Research Microbiology Community (blog). Available at https://naturemicrobiologycommunity. (accessed on 16 Jul 2019).
[Google Scholar]
Buryani S. Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian; 27 June, 2017. Available at (accessed on 16 Jul 2019).
[Google Scholar]
Fox A, Brainard J. University of California boycotts publishing giant Elsevier over journal costs and open access. Science 2019. Available at (accessed on 16 Jul 2019).
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views

PDF downloads
Show Sections