Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Filter by Categories
Acknowledgements
Book Review
Book Reviews
Classics In Indian Medicine
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Case Reports
CLINICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Clinico-pathological Conference
Conferences
Correspondence
Editorial
Eminent Indians in Medicine
Errata
Erratum
Everyday Practice
Film Review
History of Medicine
HOW TO DO IT
Images In Medicine
Letter from Bristol
Letter from Chennai
Letter From Ganiyari
Letter from Glasgow
Letter from London
Letter From Mumbai
Letter From Nepal
Masala
Medical Education
Medical Ethics
Medicine and Society
News From Here And There
Notices
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Review Article
SELECTED SUMMARIES
Selected Summary
Short Report
Short Reports
Speaking for Myself
Speaking for Ourselve
Speaking for Ourselves
Students@nmji
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
2019:32:3;190-190
doi: 10.4103/0970-258X.278680
PMID: 32129320

Can radiotherapy for breast cancer increase breast arterial calcification?

Yasemin Benderli Cihan
 Department of Radiation Oncology, Kayseri Education and Research Hospital, Kayseri 38010, Turkey

Corresponding Author:
Yasemin Benderli Cihan
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kayseri Education and Research Hospital, Kayseri 38010
Turkey
cihany@erciyes.edu.tr
How to cite this article:
Cihan YB. Can radiotherapy for breast cancer increase breast arterial calcification?. Natl Med J India 2019;32:190
Copyright: (C)2019 The National Medical Journal of India

It has been proven by randomized trials and meta-analyses that radiotherapy (RT) improves local control and survival in breast cancer. However, when RT is used for breast cancer, it is inevitable for adjacent healthy tissues and organs to be affected resulting in early and late side-effects. Early side-effects develop within the first 12 weeks of the initiation of RT while late side-effects develop months and years after RT is completed and are difficult to manage. These side-effects are mostly irreversible and have a negative impact on the quality of life of the patient.[1],[2]

RT can produce various effects in the vascular system of the breast tissue (endothelium of small and large vessels) in the acute and chronic phases. In the acute phase, they manifest as inflammation, vascular dilatation and local oedema. In the chronic phase, stenosis and occlusion of small vessels occurs together with fibrosis. In the large veins, muscle cells in the media layer disintegrate and lead to cystic medial necrosis. As a result, the vein wall weakens and ruptures. In the radiation-affected vascular endothelium, cytokines induce atherosclerosis by triggering an inflammatory process in which growth factors play a role.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5] In an experimental study, Fonkalsrud et al. found that radiation accelerated the atherosclerotic process as a result of a combination of some indirect causes such as obliteration in adventitial vasa vasora as well as direct damage such as intimal proliferation in the vascular wall structure, necrosis in the media layer and fibrosis in the adventitial layer.[3] A meta-analysis showed that RT reduces local recurrence in patients with early-stage breast cancer and a statistically significant increase in blood vessel-related mortality (p=0.0003) 10 years after RT. This analysis shows that RT causes vascular disease in the long term.[2] In the past 10 years, it has been shown that vascular damage and coronary artery injury have decreased due to advances in RT techniques. Chang et al. compared adjuvant RT in patients with breast cancer to the general population and found that the risk of acute coronary events was similar for both groups (hazard ratio 0.94; 95% CI 0.69-1). However, in a subgroup analysis of breast cancer survivors, this risk was increased in the non-exercising group (hazard ratio 2.74; CI 1.27–5.91). They emphasized that individual cardiac radiation dose and confirmatory studies were necessary.[6] While Darby et al. showed that the dose of breast RT is not above the threshold for occurrence for late heart failure,[7] Cuoma et al. reported increased side-effects on the heart depending on the dose.[8] A literature review suggests that developments in the treatment of breast cancer and the investigation of factors caused by coronary events—one of the long-term side- effects caused by these treatments—are becoming critical. Roos et al. found a direct correlation with the calcium value of the coronary artery before treatment with acute coronary events in patients receiving RT for breast cancer.[9] James et al. found no difference in the rate of cardiac side-effects seen in conventional and hypofraction RT schemes.[10] No study has examined the damage to vascular tissues; some studies have examined carotid arteries after RT.[11],[12] In their retrospective study, Woodward et al. compared both carotid arteries in patients who received supraclavicular RT treatment for breast cancer >8 years ago. They did not find a clinically significant stenosis and increase in intima-media thickness in the ipsilateral carotid artery.[11]

The prevalence of breast arterial calcification (BAC) is between 3% and 17.5%. The frequency of BAC increases with age. While it is seen in 9.1% of women under 50 years of age, its incidence is between 9% and 17% in those >65 years of age.[4] It has been reported that patients with arterial calcification in mammary tissue radiologically, have more frequent diabetes and hypertension.[8] BAC is known to be a harbinger and surrogate for the coronary arterial events.[13],[14] It is not known whether or not RT that is applied for breast cancer causes BAC or it causes an increase in BAC.

As a consequence, the vascular system of the breast is under the influence of RT directly and/or indirectly in patients who receive RT for breast cancer treatment. Although many studies reveal a relationship between arterial calcification detected by mammography and diabetes and hypertension, it is not known whether there is a relation between RT and these conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify whether the increase of calcification in BAC-positive patients is related to RT.

Conflicts of interest. None declared

References
1.
Cihan YB, Arsav V. The effects of hormonotherapy administered concurrent radiotherapy and trastuzumab on cardiac toxicity in rats. Turk Soc Cardiol 2014;14:328-33.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Favourable and unfavourable effects on long-term survival of radiotherapy for early breast cancer: An overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000;355:1757-70.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Fonkalsrud EW, Sanchez M, Zerubavel R, Mahoney A. Serial changes in arterial structure following radiation therapy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977; 145:395-400.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Reddy J, Son H, Smith SJ, Paultre F, Mosca L. Prevalence of breast arterial calcifications in an ethnically diverse population of women. Ann Epidemiol 2005; 15:344-50.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Woodward WA, Durand JB, Tucker SL, Strom EA, Perkins GH, Oh J, et al. Prospective analysis of carotid artery flow in breast cancer patients treated with supraclavicular irradiation 8 or more years previously: No increase in ipsilateral carotid stenosis after radiation noted. Cancer 2008;112:268-73.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Chang JS, Shin J, Park EC, Kim YB. Risk of cardiac disease after adjuvant radiation therapy among breast cancer survivors. Breast 2019;43:48-54.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P, Bennet AM, Blom-Goldman U, Brønnum D, et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2013;368:987-98.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Cuomo JR, Javaheri SP, Sharma GK, Kapoor D, Berman AE, Weintraub NL. How to prevent and manage radiation-induced coronary artery disease. Heart 2018; 104: 1647-53.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Roos CT, van den Bogaard VA, Greuter MJ, Vliegenthart R, Schuit E, Langendijk JA, et al. Is the coronary artery calcium score associated with acute coronary events in breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy? Radiother Oncol 2018;126: 170-6.
[Google Scholar]
10.
James M, Swadi S, Yi M, Johansson L, Robinson B, Dixit A. Ischaemic heart disease following conventional and hypofractionated radiation treatment in a contemporary breast cancer series. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018;62:425-31.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Woodward WA, Giordano SH, Duan Z, Hortobagyi GN, Buchholz TA. Supraclavicular radiation for breast cancer does not increase the 10-year risk of stroke. Cancer 2006; 106:2556-62.
[Google Scholar]
12.
Gujral DM, Shah BN, Chahal NS, Senior R, Harrington KJ, Nutting CM. Clinical features of radiation-induced carotid atherosclerosis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014;26:94-102.
[Google Scholar]
13.
Topal U, Kaderli A, Topal NB, Özdemir B, Ye°ilbursa D, Cordan J, et al. Relationship between the arterial calcification detected in mammography and coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol 2007;63:391-5.
[Google Scholar]
14.
McLenachan S, Camilleri F, Smith M, Newby DE, Williams MC. Breast arterial calcification on mammography and risk of coronary artery disease: A scot-heart sub- study. Clin Radiol 2019;74:421-8.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
51

PDF downloads
23
Show Sections