Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Book Reviews
Classics In Indian Medicine
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Case Reports
Clinical Research Methods
Clinico-pathological Conference
Eminent Indians in Medicine
Everyday Practice
Film Review
History of Medicine
Images In Medicine
Indian Medical Institutions
Letter from Bristol
Letter from Chennai
Letter From Ganiyari
Letter from Glasgow
Letter from London
Letter From Mumbai
Letter From Nepal
Medical Education
Medical Ethics
Medicine and Society
News From Here And There
Original Article
Original Articles
Review Article
Selected Summaries
Selected Summary
Short Report
Short Reports
Speaking for Myself
Speaking for Ourselve
Speaking for Ourselves
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Book Review
doi: 10.4103/0970-258X.291312
PMID: 32769253

Ethics in competitive research

Nithya Gogtay
 Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Corresponding Author:
Nithya Gogtay
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra
Published: 01-Aug-2020
How to cite this article:
Gogtay N. Ethics in competitive research. Natl Med J India 2019;32:249-250
Copyright: (C)2019 The National Medical Journal of India

Ethics in competitive research. Praveen Chaddah. 2018. 116pp, price not mentioned.

The Prologue of the book on Ethics in competitive research: Do not get scooped, do not get plagiarized begins dramatically with a statement by the author that he is arguably the most plagiarized Indian scientist. When one begins to think that this statement would lead to a deeper understanding of medical writing and the related issues of ethics, the eleven chapters of the book do not really offer new knowledge.

The first chapter is covers how research creates new knowledge, while the second dwells on formulating the right research question. The subsequent chapters are devoted to the dissemination of results and steps to be taken to prevent plagiarism including one’s own work. The author also addresses—though not seamlessly—other aspects of medical writing such as editorial processes and delays that often occur due to various reasons including dubious rejections. The book has essentially put together information that already exists in the public domain with which most scientific writers would be familiar. Some personal insights in the book perhaps may help novice writers.

Fulltext Views

PDF downloads
Show Sections