Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Acknowledgements
Authors’ reply
Book Review
Book Reviews
Classics In Indian Medicine
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Case Reports
Clinical Research Methods
Clinico-pathological Conference
Clinicopathological Conference
Conferences
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Eminent Indians in Medicine
Errata
Erratum
Everyday Practice
Film Review
History of Medicine
HOW TO DO IT
Images In Medicine
Indian Medical Institutions
Letter from Bristol
Letter from Chennai
Letter From Ganiyari
Letter from Glasgow
Letter from London
Letter from Mangalore
Letter From Mumbai
Letter From Nepal
Masala
Medical Education
Medical Ethics
Medicine and Society
News From Here And There
Notice of Retraction
Notices
Obituaries
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Review Article
Selected Summaries
Selected Summary
Short Report
Short Reports
Speaking for Myself
Speaking for Ourselve
Speaking for Ourselves
Students@nmji
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Acknowledgements
Authors’ reply
Book Review
Book Reviews
Classics In Indian Medicine
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Case Reports
Clinical Research Methods
Clinico-pathological Conference
Clinicopathological Conference
Conferences
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Eminent Indians in Medicine
Errata
Erratum
Everyday Practice
Film Review
History of Medicine
HOW TO DO IT
Images In Medicine
Indian Medical Institutions
Letter from Bristol
Letter from Chennai
Letter From Ganiyari
Letter from Glasgow
Letter from London
Letter from Mangalore
Letter From Mumbai
Letter From Nepal
Masala
Medical Education
Medical Ethics
Medicine and Society
News From Here And There
Notice of Retraction
Notices
Obituaries
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Review Article
Selected Summaries
Selected Summary
Short Report
Short Reports
Speaking for Myself
Speaking for Ourselve
Speaking for Ourselves
Students@nmji
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
35 (
2
); 125-126
doi:
10.25259/NMJI_225_21

Research temperament among undergraduate medical students: A nationwide study

Jubilee Centre for Medical Research Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute Thrissur, Kerala, India
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

To cite: Kuruvilla K, Joy AM, Kuttichira P. Research temperament among undergraduate medical students: A nationwide study [Letter. Natl Med J India 2022;35:125–6.]

Modern medicine and healthcare rely on an evidence-based approach, emphasizing the need for good scientific research. The worldwide decrease in the number of physician–researchers is a matter of concern. There are no universally accepted ways to motivate doctors; however, the literature clearly upholds the role of early induction as a promising option.1,2 Undergraduate research can thus be a possibility to enhance the physician–scientist workforce.3

Research and related activities during the undergraduate period can be mandatory, elective or extracurricular depending on the institutional norms, department culture and faculty motivation. Since early exposure is highly valued, we aimed to assess research-related activities of undergraduate medical students in India. Quantitative evaluation based on publications/projects is not appropriate. Any activity outside their curriculum showing scientific pursuit or inclination needs to be considered. Ethical waiver was obtained from our Institutional Ethics Committee.

We collected the research background of participants of a national-level research methodology programme organized from 7 to 17 September 2020 by our medical college. A total of 174 undergraduates from 57 medical colleges across India, representing 11 states/Union Territories, attended the programme and responded to the google form-based survey by furnishing the following details:

  1. Reading scientific articles/research reports

  2. Attending scientific conferences/workshops

  3. Involvement in community medicine projects (data collection, data entry, etc.)

  4. Presenting scientific papers in seminars/conferences

  5. Short-term studentship (STS)

  6. Publishing scientific articles

Data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analysed using IBM SPSS version 25. Research activities were scored in the order given above with the minimum score of 1 for reading scientific articles and the maximum of 6 for publishing activity. Kruskal–Wallis test was performed to assess the association between research activity and year of study.

The maximum respondents were from the state of Kerala (54.6%), followed by Tamil Nadu (17.2%), Karnataka (6.9%), Telangana (4.6%), Maharashtra (4.0%), Gujarat (3.5%), Puducherry (3.5%), West Bengal (2.9%), Chhattisgarh (1.2%), Punjab (1.2%) and Bihar (0.6%). The study group comprised 72.4% women and 27.6% men, with 34.5% in third year, 30.5% in second year, 20.7% in the final year and 14.4% in first year.

Our study showed that 66.1% of undergraduates were involved in research-related activities. Attending seminars/workshops were reported by 29.3%, the activity increasing with the year of study. The habit of reading scientific articles was reported by 25.9%, with maximum response from those in second year. Hands-on research experience through STS was reported by 16.7%. Scientific presentations and paper publishing by 2.9% and 1.7%, respectively, were limited to third- and fourth-year students (Table I). A single research activity was reported by 13.2%, two different activities by 9.8%, three by 8.6%, four by 4.6% and five different activities by 0.6%. Year-wise activity score showed a steady rise from first to third year, but a slight drop was noticed during the final year (Table II). The Kruskal–Wallis test found a statistically significant association between the year of study and research activity (p=0.024).

TABLE I. Research activity among undergraduate medical students
Activity Year of study (%) Total (n=174)
First (n=25) Second (n=53) Third (n=60) Fourth (n=36)
Reading articles/reports 1 6 3 4 23.3 2 5 25.86
Attending seminars/workshops 1 2 20.8 33.3 47.2 29.3
Involvement in community projects 1.9 5 5.6 3.44
Presenting research work 3.3 8.3 2.87
Short-term studentship (STS) 20.8 16.7 22.2 16.67
Publishing research 1.7 5.6 1.72
TABLE II. Year-wise research activity score of medical students
Year of study Research activity and scores Total score
Reading research articles Attending seminars workshops Community project Presenting research work Short term studentship Publishing research
First 4 6 0 0 0 0 1 0
Second 1 8 2 2 3 0 5 5 0 9 8
Third 1 4 4 0 9 8 5 0 6 127
Fourth 9 3 4 6 1 2 4 0 1 2 113

Association between the year of study and research activity score was significant (p<0.05).

The higher representation of women in the study may be a reflection of the gender disparity among the undergraduate students of medical colleges, especially in the southern states. Colleges from Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala show high women–men ratios (Christian Medical College, Vellore 1.39, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal 1.16 and Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi 1.69).4

Improved research activities with advancing year of study may be attributed to greater opportunities, exposure and enhanced interest. Previous studies have emphasized the role of Mentored Students Projects.5 The promotion of undergraduate research by the Indian Council of Medical Research through STS is noticeable in our study. Updation on current research through literature survey was reported by 34% in the second year, but showed a decline during clinical rotation and the patient exposure phase. This might retard the process of identification of research gaps and framing of well-structured clinical questions. The importance of scientific publications has been stressed by authors,6 but our study reported only 1.7% publication output. With India having a mere 1.6% share in the world medical research output,7 and the major share of it being from faculty members/ scientists from elite medical institutes, little contribution occurs from the student community.8

Over the years, a paradigm shift has occurred from experience-based medicine to evidence-based practice, making medical research and training an integral component of the medical curriculum.9 Education should ensure systematic enquiry skills along with reflective practice and action. The undergraduate curriculum (2018) of the Medical Council of India provides competency in basic biostatistics, epidemiological research designs and data collection, but does not familiarize students with critical appraisal of research findings, interpretation of statistical measures and conduct of systematic reviews. The institutional goals can focus on building research capability of students. The revised Graduate Medical Education Regulation, Part II (2019) prescribes two mandatory elective blocks; the first one is in basic sciences or research. Students opting for research can take up projects or participate in pre-existing projects under a preceptor for one month.10 Association with an active researcher/research department can be motivating and rewarding for the student.

Research temperament of the study group is promising, showing direct relation with the year of study. Involvement in research and updation on global research activities is appreciable. The research output among the group appeared inadequate.

Conflicts of interest

None declared

References

  1. , , , , . Impact of elective versus required medical school research experiences on career outcomes. J Investig Med. 2017;65:942-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Integration of scientific research training into undergraduate medical education: A reminder call. Med Educ Online. 2013;18:22832.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Impact of medical student research in the development of physician-scientists. J Investig Med. 2003;51:149-56.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. . Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India. Available at www.nirfindia.org/2020/MedicalRanking.html (accessed on 14 Mar, 2021)
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Lack of research amongst undergraduate medical students in India: It's time to act and act now. Indian Pediatr. 2017;54:357-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Scientific activity by medical students: The relationship between academic publishing during medical school and publication careers after graduation. Perspect Med Educ. 2019;8:223-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , . A scientometric analysis of Indian research output in medicine during 1999-2008. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2011;2:87-100.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Patterns and trends of medical student research. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:175.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Outcome for graduates (Tomorrow's doctors) General Medical Council. . Available at www.gmc-uk.org/static/documents/content/Outcomes_for_graduates_Dec_16.pdf (accessed on 18 Mar 2021)
    [Google Scholar]
  10. . Electives for the Undergraduate Medical Education Training Program. 2020:1-30. Available at www.nmc.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Electives-Module-20-05-2020.pdf (accessed on 18 May 2020)
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
1,154

PDF downloads
229
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections